Tips

Tip: Click on each link to expand and view the content. Click again to collapse.

Chapter 2 - What you Can (and Can't) Do with Qualitative Research

Quantitative methods are usually the most appropriate if you want to find out social facts or the causes of some phenomenon. If you are more interested in how social phenomena arise in the interactions of their participants, then qualitative methods should be your choice.

Chapters 3 and 4 - The Research Experience

Not every document you come across in your research has to be treated as a set of true or false statements. Take any one document relevant to your topic and ask:
  • How has the document been put together to make its statements seem credible?
  • What can you learn from this about how the topics you are concerned with are being ‘constructed’ by the authors of this document?
  • Where could you find other documents which might construct these ‘facts’ differently?

Chapter 7 - Theory

Students often err by assuming that ‘theory’ is best done from the armchair while speculating upon great philosophical problems. By contrast, theorising is best accomplished by thinking through the implications of how you have gathered and analysed your data.

Chapter 9 - How Many Cases Do You Need?

Try not to be defensive if your data is limited to one or two ‘cases’. Instead, seek to understand the logic behind such an approach and work out what you can gain by intensive analysis of limited but rich data.

Chapter 12 - Collecting Qualitative Data

  • Don’t think of the role of the interviewer as just asking questions. Consider the variety of your other actions e.g. saying ‘hmm, mm’, reformulating a question, agreeing and remaining silent. Always assess how these influence what an interviewee says.
  • If you are interested in understanding people’s experiences, do not assume that the interview is the only appropriate research method.
  • Like so many activities when doing qualitative research, choosing a transcription method is never a purely technical matter. Transcription is saturated with theoretical assumptions.

Chapter 14 - CAQDAS

  • Visit the web sites of CAQDAS software sellers and see if you can download a test version: try before you buy!
  • The quality of your project will depend largely on the quality of the analytic categories you use to understand your data. Pretty often, these categories are embodied in a coding scheme.
  • CAQDAS can’t do your thinking for you but once you have applied a coding scheme to your data the software can speed up your ability to think about your codes, as well as retrieve data associated with each code

Chapter 15 - Quality in Qualitative Research

Apparent ‘contradictions’ in your data depend on the model you are employing. For constructionists, such contradictions may reflect the different discourses that are being used by participants.

Chapter 16 - Evaluating Qualitative Research

Potter and Hepburn introduce the anthropological terms ‘emic’ and ‘etic’. ‘Emic’ refers to the categories that participants use. ‘Etic’ refers to an analyst’s categories.

Chapter 21 - Writing your Data Chapters

Romanticism is an approach in which ‘authenticity’ is attached to ‘personal’experiences. Although this approach originated in the early nineteenth century, it underlies much contemporary popular culture.

Chapter 23 - Making Good Use of your Supervisor

Providing your supervisor is willing, it makes sense to audio record each supervision as well as to keep written notes. This will allow you to review what was said in greater detail. It may also provide material for your methodology chapter.

Chapter 26 - Getting Published

Contexting your research in a tradition is a tricky task if you want to publish an article. Following Best’s argument, it is helpful to show that you understand how your work connects to what has gone before. On the other hand, you should not spend too much time in a historical review. Perhaps the best solution to this problem is to seek to tie your article to previous papers or debates in the journal concerned.

Chapter 27 - Audiences

Workshops for policy makers or professionals need not always be organized around presentations of your research findings. Alternative points of discussion are often more fruitful (e.g. presentations of ‘interesting’ raw data or inviting people present to begin by suggesting what they would like to get out of your research - this can also be done prior to the meeting when you send out invitations).

 

Author: David Silverman

Pub Date: April 2013

Pages: 488

Learn more about this book